Originally Posted by HappyJack
If you believe in evolution over creationism, then if she is old enough to bleed, she is old enough to breed. You must realize that if young women like her weren't breeding before the advent of textile clothing, ie. still wearing un-tanned furs, our species may not be around today. Can you imagine where we'd be now as a species if 500,000 years ago our ancestors would have placed age restrictions on fertile females at 17/18 years of age?
Just because somebody can do something doesn't mean they should.
That goes for young girls who post pictures of themselves on the webz for attention. That goes for guys reposting said pictures. That goes for Secret Service guys legally engaging prostitutes in foreign countries. It also goes for guys trying to make light of or defend stuff that probabaly shouldn't have been done in the first place.
If you're going to use fertility as a measuring stick based on history; when reproduction at 13 and 14 was more common, don't forget life expectancy was less than 40. Now that we are past the knuckle dragging days of old and woman live to be 80, there is a new social norm where the expectation is that as an adult male you might look and notice but you don't go further than that. A significant number of the child porn guys in Federal Prison tried to use your enlightened perspective as justification when they had their moment across from a Federal Agent in small windowless room. Ask yourself this, if you were loking at those pictures and your mother, wife, girlfriend or all three walked in and were looking over your shoulder, what would their reaction be if you told them that in some of the photos the girls was only 14.
Closed Circuit to Cockula, it is a fact that in some of those picture she is only 14.