|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
If things like this keep happening, I'll homeschool my kids, and it'll be way harder than anything in the school system now.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
medical schools nowadays are doing things even simpler. pass/fail. you trust your doctor right? a grade letter is kind of meaningless because not every kid can be your model student that comes to class with a smile, goes home to a wonderful white suburban family, and studies while watching TV
if anything, making a kid repeat what he failed is better because now he can see it again, which not only aids in learning, but also helps the kid integrate the knowledge so it isn't forgotten about over the weekend |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bullsh!t. Enough said...
This is just another example of a rich high school trying to cater to the desires of over-achieving parents who want their children to have the appearance of success at all costs. Having spent two years at a school like this I saw how kids feel entitled to a good grade. My peers would hand papers in two months late and still get B's. At my previous high school, it would've been an F after only a matter of days. We are really moving away from accountability in both our government and our education system. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
At my high school if you failed a degree-required class or didn't have enough credits for graduation, you could take the required classes on nights and weekends or over the summer to make up the credit, but the failing grade was still recorded. Basically, the school provided ways for them to make up the failed classes, but the kids didn't get to erase that 27 they got in sophomore English as if it never happened. Our school it was actually rather easy to not get the full credit for a class you needed to graduate, which was probably worse than making it too easy to graduate (probably why we had a 40% drop-out rate from Frosh-Senior year). They graded by semester in half-credits, not by your year-long GPA (I actually thought this policy was dumb as hell, because a student could totally turn things around and work harder and still be ****ed) Basically if a kid got a 68 the first semester and an 80 the second, it wouldn't matter that their average for the year was a passing 74, they only get half a credit because they only passed one semester, so if it's a graduation requirement they have to take a semester of the class through night classes or summer classes or graduate late. I just feel like in public education today there are SO many things that award mediocrity and dress it up as something more while either totally ignoring or even hindering those who work hard and accomplish something.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
End useful post. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
We also didn't rank the class by GPA (even to the nearest 10% or anything), which is also a good thing. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
on the other hand, the kids who either can't get it or for whatever reason don't care and are fine being mediocre are either a) getting another chance or b) being told to do it over again (more work, encourages to kid to avoid being mediocre to avoid repeating the behavior that got him there) in every school, there will be the excellent, the good, and the poor performers. that's just statistics. i think the point is to shift the curve to the right, and just saying you have an F go work as a day laborer isn't effective. the point is to get those kids to learn and integrate material - the bright kids will do fine either way and will be rewarded regardless |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Frankly, I think it's great. ease the "workaholic" mindset out of this country and people will just be happier |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|